Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Lucas Carrillo v. City of Portland, et al
as 22-35730
Plaintiff / Appellant: LUCAS CARRILLO, Personal Representative of the Estate of Aaron Joseph Danielson
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF PORTLAND, a municipal corporation, MICHAEL SCHMIDT, an individual and EDWARD TEVIS WHEELER, (Ted)
Joseph Hall v. City of Portland, et al
as 22-35705
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSEPH HALL, an individual
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF PORTLAND, a municipal corporation and EDWARD TEVIS WHEELER, an individual
Index Newspapers LLC, et al v. United States Marshals Service, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-35739
Plaintiff / Appellee: JUSTIN YAU, and those similarly situated, ALEX MILAN TRACY, BRIAN CONLEY and others
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Defendant: CITY OF PORTLAND, a municipal corporation; and JOHN DOES, 1-60; individual and supervisory officers of Portland Police Bureau and other agencies working in concert,
Amicus Curiae: THE COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH AND REPORTERS WITHOUT BORDERS and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, AND 14 NEWS MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS
Natanya Bolden v. City of Portland, et al
as 14-35631
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATANYA V. BOLDEN
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF PORTLAND, a municipal corporation, TODD GRADWAHL, Portland Police Officer and MEGAN BURKEEN, Portland Police Officer
Natanya Bolden v. City of Portland, et al
as 14-35478
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATANYA V. BOLDEN
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF PORTLAND, a municipal corporation, TODD GRADWAHL, Portland Police Officer and MEGAN BURKEEN, Portland Police Officer
Sean Hartfield v. Leo Besner, et al
as 13-35093
Plaintiff - Appellant: SEAN L. HARTFIELD
Defendant - Appellee: LEO BESNER, individually and in his official capacity as an officer of the Portland Police Department, CITY OF PORTLAND, a municipal corporation, WILLIE HALLIBURTON and others
The Bookstore, Inc., et al v. Randy Leonard, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-35436
Plaintiff - Appellant: THE BOOKSTORE, INC., an Oregon corporation, DANIEL COSSETTE, DONNA COSSETTE and others
Defendant - Appellee: RANDY LEONARD, individually and in his official capacity as Portland City Commissioner, MICHAEL ALDERMAN, individually and in his official capacity as Portland City Fire Inspector, JEFF MYERS, individually and in his official capacity as Portland Police Bureau Officer and others
Defendant: PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, an Oregon corporation
Roberta Kelly, et al v. U.S. Bank, et al
as 10-36144
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERTA KELLY
Plaintiff: D. LAWRENCE OLSTAD
Defendant - Appellee: U.S. BANK, BISHOP, WHITE & MARSHALL, P.S., a Washington professional services company and KRISTA WHITE
Third-party-plaintiff - Appellee: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Third-party-defendant: CITY OF PORTLAND, a municipal corporation, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., an inactive Oregon corporation, CREDIT CARD RECEIVABLES FUND INCORPORATED, an Ohio corporation and others
Roberta Kelly, et al v. U.S. Bank, et al
as 10-36041
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERTA KELLY
Plaintiff: D. LAWRENCE OLSTAD
Defendant - Appellee: U.S. BANK, BISHOP, WHITE & MARSHALL, P.S., a Washington professional services company and KRISTA WHITE
Third-party-plaintiff - Appellee: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Third-party-defendant: CITY OF PORTLAND, a municipal corporation, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., an inactive Oregon corporation, CREDIT CARD RECEIVABLES FUND INCORPORATED, an Ohio corporation and others
Thunderbird Hotels, LLC v. City of Portland, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-35025
Plaintiff - Appellant: THUNDERBIRD HOTELS, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF PORTLAND, a municipal corporation and SAM ADAMS, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the City of Portland

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?