Cases filed in Pennsylvania
CITY OF PROVIDENCE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2017cv05058
Plaintiff: CITY OF PROVIDENCE
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JANSSEN BIOTECH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NATIONAL EMPLOYEES HEALTH PLAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv04326
Defendant: JANSSEN BIOTECH, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff: NATIONAL EMPLOYEES HEALTH PLAN, LOCAL 295 IBT EMPLOYER GROUP WELFARE FUND and THE WELFARE FUND OF PLUMBERS LOCAL UNION NO. 200
Petitioner: THE CITY OF PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND, STATE OF ILLINOIS ATTORNEY GENERAL, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
In Re: REMICADE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Interested Party: THE KROGER CO and WALGREEN CO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
HEED et al v. UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES INC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv02817
Plaintiff: DAVID HEED
Movant: TEAMSTERS LOCAL 456 PENSION FUND , TEAMSTERS LOCAL 456 ANNUITY FUND , LABOURERS' PENSION FUND OF CENTRAL AND EASTERN CANADA and others
Defendant: UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES INC , ALAN B. MILLER and STEVE FILTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
CITY OF PROVIDENCE v. ALLERGAN PLC et al
as 2:2016cv04308
Plaintiff: CITY OF PROVIDENCE
Defendant: ALLERGAN PLC, ACTAVIS PLC, LANNETT COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
CITY OF PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND v. RECKITT BENCKISER PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01621
Plaintiff: CITY OF PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND
Defendant: RECKITT BENCKISER PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., RECKITT BENCKISER GROUP, PLC and INDIVIDIOR, PLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
CITY OF PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND v. ABBVIE INC. et al
as 2:2013cv05656
Plaintiff: CITY OF PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND
Defendant: ABBVIE INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES, BARR PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?