Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MSN Laboratories Private Ltd.In re: MSN Laboratories Private Ltd.
as 24-112
Petitioner:
In re: MSN LABORATORIES PRIVATE LTD.
Respondent:
BIOPROJET SOCIETE CIVILE DE RECHERCHE
In re: Waverly Licensing LLC
as 23-109
Petitioner:
In re: WAVERLY LICENSING LLC, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LAWYERS FOR CIVIL JUSTICE and others
Respondent:
AT&T MOBILITY LLC and GRANITE RIVER LABS INC.
NVLSP v. US
as 19-1081
Amicus Curiae:
CALIFORNIA NEWS PUBLISHERS ASSOCIATION, RADIO TELEVISION DIGITAL NEWS ASSOCIATION, JUDICATA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM, ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE and NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER
Defendant / Cross Appellant:
UNITED STATES
CIVIL et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2009vv00870
Petitioner:
LUCIEN CIVIL , NADEGE CIVIL and LUCE-NAIDGE CIVIL
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 300
Type:
Other Statutes
FOUNDATION CHRISTIAN V MARY QUEEN
as 09-1432
Appellee:
Mary Queen of the Third Millenium, Inc.
Appellant:
The Foundation for a Christian Civilization, Inc.
ROMERO V DEFENSE
as 07-3322
Amicus Curiae:
American Civil Liberties Union of the National Capital Area
Respondent:
Department of Defense
Petitioner:
Wilfredo Romero
WECHSLER V MSPB
as 07-3104
Amicus Curiae:
American Civil Liberties Union of the National Capital Area
Petitioner:
David M. Wechsler
Respondent:
Merit Systems Protection Board
IN RE BILSKI
as 07-1130
Amicus Curiae:
Accenture, American Civil Liberties Union, American Express Company and others
Appellant:
Bernard L. Bilski and Rand A. Warsaw
Appellee:
Jon W. Dudas, Director, Patent and Trademark Office
Jon W. Dudas, Director, Patent And Trademark Office:
and
HELMARK STEEL V DOT
as 00-1120
Defendant-Appellee:
CLEMENT H. MONGE, Regional Director USDOT Dept Office of CivIL RIGHTS and DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Plaintiff-Appellant:
HELMARK STEEL, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
