Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Clarence Tate et al v. Leimert Properties 4227, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01897
Defendant:
Deputy Robinson, County of Los Angeles Sheriff Department, Dennis Block and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Demetrius Tate, Earle Otha Jones and William Marshall
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Clarence Demetrius Tate v. Robert Trimble
as 2:2011cv06048
Petitioner:
Clarence Demetrius Tate
Respondent:
Robert Trimble
Clarence Demetrius Tate v. Sue Summerset et al
as 5:2010cv01561
Defendant:
ABC Ventures, Austin Quality Corporation of America, Kellogg Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Demetrius Tate
Clarence Demetrius Tate v. Board of Prison Hearings et al
as 5:2010cv01304
Defendant:
Board of Prison Hearings and Forensic Assessment Division
Plaintiff:
Clarence Demetrius Tate
Tate v. Summerset et al
as 2:2010cv01386
Plaintiff:
Clarence Demetrius Tate
Defendant:
Sue Summerset, Kellogg Corporation, Austin Quality Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Board of Prison Hearings et al
as 3:2010cv01331
Plaintiff:
Clarence Demetrius Tate
Defendant:
Board of Prison Hearings and Forensic Assessment Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, et al. v. Summerset, et al.
as 4:2009cv05928
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Smith, Clarence Demetrius Tate, WIlliam A. Marshall and others
Defendant:
Sue Summerset, Kellog Austin Quality Foods, Peanut Corp of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarence Tate v. Debra Herndon
as 09-73169
Petitioner:
CLARENCE DEMETRIUS TATE
Respondent:
DEBRA HERNDON
Tate et al v. Summersett et al
as 3:2009cv03538
Plaintiff:
Clarence Demetrius Tate and WIlliam A. Marshall
Defendant:
Sue Summersett, Kellog, Austin Quality Foods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
