Cases 1 - 10 of 328
Clark v. Pinellas County Sheriff Department et al
as 8:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
Robert Abraham Clark
Defendant:
Pinellas County Sheriff Department, Pinellas County Jail Medical Staff, Unknown Medical Provider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Withers et al
as 5:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
George Clark
Defendant:
Shannon Withers and FNU George
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Clark v. Withers et al
as 6:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
George Clark
Defendant:
Warden Shannon Withers and George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bright v. Clark et al
as 5:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Carnell Bright
Defendant:
FNU Clark and FNU Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00119
Petitioner:
Merrill Clark Gardner
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Massard v. GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 9:2023cv81228
Plaintiff:
Christian Massard
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc., Geo Care, Sgt. Ms. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HALL v. SIMMONS et al
as 3:2023cv23986
Plaintiff:
PERCY L HALL
Defendant:
CHIP SIMMONS, CLARK, HINFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Allen et al
as 3:2023cv00630
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
D. Allen, A. Woren, M.G. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARDNER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2023cv10077
Petitioner:
MERRILL CLARK GARDNER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Clark v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2023cv10027
Plaintiff:
Fred Davis Clark, Jr.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
