Cases 1 - 9 of 9
David Clapper, et al v. Clark Development, Inc., et al
as 17-4056
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. CLAPPER, et al
Appellant:
BRENT L. ENGLISH
Defendant:
CLARK DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK
David Clapper, et al v. Clark Development, Inc., et al
as 16-4231
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. CLAPPER
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BRUNO
Defendant:
CLARK DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK and JAMES MYERS
David Clapper v. Clark Development, Inc.
as 16-3206
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID M. CLAPPER
Defendant - Appellant:
CLARK DEVELOPMENT, INC.
David Clapper, et al v. Clark Development, Inc., et al
as 15-4386
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. CLAPPER, et al.
Appellant:
BRENT L. ENGLISH
Defendant:
CLARK DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK
David Clapper v. Clark Development, Inc., et al
as 14-3770
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. CLAPPER
Appellant:
DAVID BRUNO
Defendant:
CLARK DEVELOPMENT, INC., et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK and JAMES MYERS
David Clapper v. Clark Development, Inc., et al
as 14-3500
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. CLAPPER
Appellant:
DAVID BRUNO
Defendant:
CLARK DEVELOPMENT, INC., et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK and JAMES MYERS
Clapper v. Clark Development Inc et al
as 0:2012mc61748
Plaintiff:
David M. Clapper
Defendant:
Clark Development Inc, Mikar Ltd and Estate of Karen M Clark
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Clapper v. Clark Development, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv00569
Plaintiff:
David M. Clapper and David M. Clapper
Defendant:
Clark Development, Inc., Mikar, Ltd., Unizan Bank National Association and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Clapper v. Clark Development, Inc. et al
as 5:2008cv02452
Defendant:
Clark Development, Inc., Mikar, Ltd., Unizan Bank National Association and others
Plaintiff:
David M. Clapper and David M. Clapper
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
