Cases 11 - 20 of 72
Rover Pipeline LLC et al v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission et al
as 5:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC and Energy Transfer LP
Defendant:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Chairman Richard Glick, Commissioner James Danly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Clervrain v. DeWine, et al
as 1:2021cv01303
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Richard Michael DeWine, Sherrod Brown, Kelly Tallman Clements and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Clements v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02851
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Clements
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clements v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2021cv01777
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
John F. Clements
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson v. Cuyahoga County et al
as 1:2020cv02783
Defendant:
Gregory Croucher, Eric Ivey, Armond Budish and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clements v. USA
as 1:2020cv02388
Petitioner:
David Clements
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Clements v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05125
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary C. Clements
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clement v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04614
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Timothy J Clement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parra v. Cuyahoga County et al
as 1:2020cv01641
Defendant:
Timothy Coyne, John Doe, 7-10, Cuyahoga County and others
Plaintiff:
Miada Parra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clement v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv03716
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Ricardo D. Clement
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
