Cases 1 - 10 of 49
(PC) Mitchell v. CDCR, et al
as 2:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mitchell
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), California Medical Facility, (CMF) Staff at R&R and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David James Krause v. C.M.F.
as 2:2023cv08744
Petitioner:
David James Krause
Respondent:
CMF Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Martinez v. California State Prison CMF et al
as 2:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Fred Feleki Martinez
Defendant:
California State Prison CMF, Jones, Sac and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Williams v. Brant et al
as 2:2022cv01293
Plaintiff:
Willie Royce Williams
Defendant:
F. Brant, CMF-Office of Grievances, J. Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) McKenna v. Cisneros et al
as 2:2022cv01294
Plaintiff:
Edward Phillip McKenna
Defendant:
T. Cisneros, Warden CSP-Corcoran, Warden Mule Creek State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Camacho v. CMF Vacaville
as 2:2022cv00608
Plaintiff:
Luis Ceja Camacho
Defendant:
CMF Vacaville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) McClendon v. Secretary of CDCR et al
as 2:2021cv02088
Plaintiff:
Dennis E. McClendon
Defendant:
Secretary of CDCR, Warden of CMF, Facility CDW of CMF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Newsom et al
as 3:2020cv02398
Defendant:
Adams, DOES 1 to 5, CCI Godinez and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Allen Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC) Birks v. Fox
as 2:2019cv00271
Defendant:
CDCR, Robert Fox and CMF Maintenance Dept.
Plaintiff:
Darren Birks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthur G. Lawrence v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv03050
Defendant:
Biomet, Inc., Does, Walter Lorenz Surgical and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur G. Lawrence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
