Cases 1 - 6 of 6
CINCINNATI SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. CODE 3 SECURITY & PROTECTION SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01352
Plaintiff:
CINCINNATI SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
CODE 3 SECURITY & PROTECTION SERVICES, INC., LINCOLN-WESTMORELAND HOUSING, INC., CHARLES TINI & ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company v. Code 3 Security & Protection Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv02815
Plaintiff:
Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company
Defendant:
Code 3 Security & Protection Services, Inc., Cynthia Kinard, McMills Sowah and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
The Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company v. Code 3 Security & Protection Services, Inc et al
as 8:2016cv00127
Plaintiff:
The Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company
Defendant:
Code 3 Security & Protection Services, Inc, Christopher H. Legagneur and Robert Otto Mansperger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CINCINNATI SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. CODE 3 SECURITY & PROTECTION SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv02028
Plaintiff:
CINCINNATI SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
CODE 3 SECURITY & PROTECTION SERVICES, INC., MM PROPERTY, LLC and MONIQUE NICHOLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
CINCINNATI SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. CODE 3 SECURITY & PROTECTION SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv02018
Plaintiff:
CINCINNATI SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
CODE 3 SECURITY & PROTECTION SERVICES, INC., TREVER EDELIN and KEITH LOVING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
BAKER et al v. TYLER HOUSE ASSOCIATES 95 L.P. et al
as 1:2015cv00014
Plaintiff:
JASMINE BAKER , JAWANDA BAKER and MICHELLE BAKER
Defendant:
TYLER HOUSE ASSOCIATES 95 L.P. and CODE 3 SECURITY & PROTECTION SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
