Cases 1 - 10 of 261
Coleman v. Shreveport Police Dept
as 5:2023cv01526
Plaintiff:
Eric Coleman
Defendant:
Shreveport Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2023cv01416
Petitioner:
Rodrick Coleman and Dre
Respondent:
State of Louisiana and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Augustine v. LeBlanc et al
as 5:2023cv01131
Plaintiff:
Joseph Augustine
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Michele Dauzat, Jerry Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Mitchell et al
as 5:2023cv00872
Plaintiff:
Kiywon Bonner
Defendant:
Luke Mitchell, James Boddie and Wyane T Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Ford et al
as 5:2022cv05736
Plaintiff:
Euric Cain
Defendant:
Deandre Ford, Bruce Solomon, Jerry Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Probation & Parole et al
as 3:2022cv02187
Plaintiff:
Jr Alfred Coleman and Alfred Coleman, Jr
Defendant:
Probation & Parole and Edward Esters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Houma Police Department
as 2:2022cv00748
Plaintiff:
Terry Lynn Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Houma Police Department, Dana Coleman and Unidentified Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Farris
as 5:2022cv00524
Plaintiff:
Alexander Coleman
Defendant:
Rick Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Coleman v. Myers et al
as 2:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
Ollie Coleman
Defendant:
Marcus Myers
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coleman v. Shreveport et al
as 5:2022cv00516
Plaintiff:
Alexander Coleman
Defendant:
City of Shreveport, P Tucker, K9 Cairo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
