Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Adams v. Alberto-Culver USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08405
Plaintiff:
Sheri Adams
Defendant:
Alberto-Culver USA, Inc., Barretts Minerals Inc., BRENNTAG NORTH AMERICA, INC., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to MINERAL PIGMENT SOLUTIONS, INC. and as successor-in-interest to WHITTAKER CLARK & DANIELS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Patora v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.
as 7:2023cv01118
Plaintiff:
Jeannie Patora
Defendant:
Colgate-Palmolive Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Esquibel et al v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. et al
as 1:2023cv00742
Plaintiff:
Abigail Esquibel, Tammy Searle, Jeremy Wahl and others
Defendant:
Colgate-Palmolive Co. and Tom's of Maine, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Graham v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2020cv08876
Defendant:
Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc., THE PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY, individually and as successor in interest to YARDLEY OF LONDON, INC., LAURA MERCIER COSMETICS and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Hardman et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al
as 1:2018cv11223
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Cyprus Mines Corp., Imerys Talc America Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jody E. Hardman and Betsey P. Hardman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
de Lacour et al v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. et al
as 1:2016cv08364
Plaintiff:
Anne de Lacour and Andrea Wright
Defendant:
Colgate-Palmolive Co. and Tom's of Maine Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caufield et al v. Colgate-Palmolive Co et al
as 1:2016cv04170
Plaintiff:
Paul Caufield and Rebecca M Staley
Defendant:
Colgate-Palmolive Co., Colgate-Palmolive Co. Employee's Ret. Income Plan, Laura Flavin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Canale v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.
as 7:2016cv03308
Plaintiff:
Lori Canale
Defendant:
Colgate-Palmolive Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
