Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Dicks v. Schatz et al
as 1:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Karl Orlando Dicks
Defendant:
Brian Schatz, Calvin Say, Choon James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Donald Trump v. Bennie Thompson, et al
as 21-5254
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Donald J. Trump, in his capacity as the 45th President of the United States
Defendant / Appellee:
Bennie G. Thompson, in his official capacity as Chairman of the United States House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, David Ferriero, in his official capacity as Archivist of the United States, National Archives and Records Administration, United States House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack On The United States Capitol and others
Amicus Curiae:
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, Virginia Canter, Richard Painter and others
Norwood-Ching v. Nakamura et al
as 1:2012cv00011
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Lee Norwood-Ching
Defendant:
Greg Nakamura, Harry P. Freitas, Barbara T. Takase and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Ciacci v. DOJ, et al
as 11-5257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael K. Ciacci
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Tort Branch, Neil A. Abercrombie, Executive Chambers, Les Ihara, Jr. and others
CIACCI v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2011cv01442
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL K. CIACCI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, NEIL A. ABERCROMBIE, LES IHARA, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Ciacci v. USA, et al
as 11-5186
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael K. Ciacci
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Neil Abercrombie, U.S. Representative, State of Hawaii and others
CIACCI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv00590
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL K. CIACCI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NEIL A. ABERCROMBIE, STATE OF HAWAII and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
