Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Branch Banking and Trust Compa v. Betty Rogers
as 15-10529
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation, successor in interest to Colonial Bank by asset acquisition from the FDIC as receiver for Colonial Bank
Defendant - Appellant:
BETTY ROGERS
Branch Banking & Trust Company v. Paul Meng, et al
as 14-15278
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY, as successor-in-interest to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Colonial Bank
Defendant - Appellant:
PAUL MENG, LANCE T. GAUDE, DOUGLAS R. ADAMS and others
Branch Banking & Trust v. S&S Development, Inc., et al
as 14-13914
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation, as successor-in-interest to Colonial Bank by asset acquisition from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank, successor by merger to Citrus and Chemical Bank
Defendant / Appellant:
S&S DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Florida corporation, BRIAN K. SWAIN, individually and DONALD K. STEPHENS, individually
Greenberg v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
as 8:2014cv02071
Plaintiff:
Joanne Greenberg and Starkey Road, Inc.
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA and Colonial Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Branch Banking and Trust Compa v. S&S Development, Inc., et al
as 14-12880
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation, as successor-in-interest to Colonial Bank by asset acquisition from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank, successor by merger to Citrus and Chemical Bank
Defendant - Appellant:
S&S DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Florida Corporation and BRIAN K. SWAIN
Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. S&S Development, Inc., et al
as 14-12879
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation, as successor-in-interest to Colonial Bank by asset acquisition from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank, successor by merger to Citrus and Chemical Bank
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD K. STEPHENS, S&S DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Florida corporation and BRIAN K. SWAIN, individually
Branch Banking and Trust Compa v. David Frank, et al
as 14-15619
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, successor-in-interest to Colonial Bank by acquisition of assets from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank, a North Carolina banking corporation organized and in good standing under the laws of the State of North Carolin
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID M. FRANK, individually and as Trustee of The David M. Frank 2004 Revocable Inter Vivos Trust dated December 31. 2004, KAVEH KEVIN GOLSHAN, individually, MOUSSA GOLSHAN, as Trustee of the AGA Irrevocable Trust dated December 7, 1995 and others
Branch Banking and Trust Compa v. David Frank, et al
as 14-15452
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, successor-in-interest to Colonial Bank by acquisition of assets from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank, a North Carolina banking corporation organized and in good standing under the laws of the State of North Carolin
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID M. FRANK, individually and as Trustee of The David M. Frank 2004 Revocable Inter Vivos Trust dated December 31. 2004, KAVEH KEVIN GOLSHAN, individually, MOUSSA GOLSHAN, as Trustee of the AGA Irrevocable Trust dated December 7, 1995 and others
Charles Schwab & Company, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Colonial Bank et al
as 2:2013cv00578
Plaintiff:
Charles Schwab & Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Colonial Bank, Jack C. Brandon , James C. Franklin, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Branch Banking and Trust Compa v. Crystal Garrett
as 12-12780
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, successor in interest to Colonial Bank, by asset acquisition from FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank
Defendant - Appellant:
CRYSTAL GARRETT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
