Contract Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 55
The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. et al v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP et al(LEAD CASE) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00746
Defendant: Crowe Horwath, LLP and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Plaintiff: The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and Kevin O'Halloran
Consolidated Plaintiff: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Colonial Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. Oswald Carrerou, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-14404
Plaintiff - Appellee: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation, as successor-in-interest to Colonial Bank, successor by merger to Citrus and Chemical Bank
Defendant - Appellant: OSWALD P. CARREROU, individually, CRYSTAL CENTRE, LLC, A Florida limited liability company, DONALD K. STEPHENS, individually and others
Branch Banking and Trust Compa v. D.M.S.I., LLC, et al
as 16-16710
Plaintiff - Appellee: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, as successor in interest on behalf of Colonial Bank, N.A.
Defendant - Appellant: D.M.S.I., LLC, NOAM SCHWARTZ, NST HOLDING, INC., Trustee and others
BBT v. Hamilton Greens, LLC, et al
as 16-15590
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation, successor-in-interest to Colonial Bank by Asset Acquisition from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank, N.A.
Defendant - Appellee: RICHARD P. BELLINGER, individually and MAUREEN DONNELLY
: CHAD LABONTE, individually, HAMILTON GREENS, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, DEVCON LIVINGSTON GREENS, LLC, a Florida limited liability company and others
BBT v. Hamilton Greens, LLC, et al
as 16-15186
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation, successor-in-interest to Colonial Bank by Asset Acquisition from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank, N.A.
Defendant - Appellee: MAUREEN DONNELLY and RICHARD P. BELLINGER, Individually
: HAMILTON GREENS, LLC, a Florida limited liability company
Branch Banking & Trust v. S&S Development, Inc., et al
as 14-13914
Plaintiff / Appellee: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation, as successor-in-interest to Colonial Bank by asset acquisition from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank, successor by merger to Citrus and Chemical Bank
Defendant / Appellant: S&S DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Florida corporation, BRIAN K. SWAIN, individually and DONALD K. STEPHENS, individually
Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. D.M.S.I., LLC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-16933
Plaintiff - Appellee: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, as successor in interest on behalf of Colonial Bank, N.A.
Defendant - Appellant: D.M.S.I., LLC, NOAM SCHWARTZ, NST HOLDING, INC., Trustee and others
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Colonial Bank v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company
as 1:2015cv23018
Plaintiff: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Colonial Bank
Defendant: Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Branch Banking and Trust Comp v. EBR Investments LLC, et al
as 15-13308
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross Appellant: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation, as successor-in-interest to Colonial Bank by asset acquisition from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank
Defendant - Appellant-Cross Appellee: STEWART DUDLEY, EBR INVESTMENTS LLC and SRD ASSURANCE CORPORATION
Branch Banking and Trust Comp v. EBR Investments LLC, et al
as 15-13309
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation, as successor-in-interest to Colonial Bank by asset acquisition from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank
Defendant - Appellee: EBR INVESTMENTS LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability company, STEWART DUDLEY, individually and SRD ASSURANCE CORPORATION, a Nevada Corporation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?