Cases 81 - 90 of 22,678
Kelley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Mark Kelley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Alfonso Lepe v. Martin J. OMalley
as 5:2024cv00840
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Lepe
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Munger v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
Curtis Edward Munger
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fisher v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
Melissa O Fisher
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fias v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05307
Plaintiff:
Clarissa Fias
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Pope v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Alecsis Pope
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cannon v. O'Malley
as 24-2539
Plaintiff:
DAVID CANNON
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Colton Moore
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Contor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05302
Plaintiff:
Lora Lou Contor
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Graham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05301
Plaintiff:
Alexa N Graham
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
