Cases 31 - 40 of 211
Campos et al v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv05143
Plaintiff:
LAQUANA CAMPOS, on behalf of herself and her minor child, K.C.; TOSHA ADAMS; NORMAN MARSH; and BETTI RODNYANSKAYA, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Laquana Campos and others
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Talyosef v. Saul
as 21-2163
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Caryn Talyosef
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew M. Saul, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Claudio-Montanez v. Kijakazi
as 21-2027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ana Claudio-Montanez
Defendant / Appellee:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Rivers v. Kijakazi
as 21-1935
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Krystal Rivers
Defendant / Appellee:
Kilolo Kijakzazi, Commissioner of Social Security, Kilolo Kijakzazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Plumb v. Commissioner of Social Securit
as 21-1856
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jaice Plumb
Defendant / Appellee:
Commissioner of Social Security
Holland v. Commissioner of Social Securit
as 21-1768
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darren J. Holland
Defendant / Appellee:
Commissioner of Social Security
Loucks v. Commissioner of Social Securit
as 21-1749
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Glenda Loucks
Defendant / Appellee:
Commissioner of Social Security
Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Social Securit
as 21-1449
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hector Gonzalez
Hill v. Commissioner of Social Securit
as 21-1295
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nancy Hill, R.N.
Defendant / Appellee:
Commissioner of Social Security
Criscitello v. Saul
as 21-1222
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeaninne Criscitello
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
