Cases 41 - 46 of 46
Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO v. AT&T INC. et al
as 5:2008cv00848
Plaintiff:
Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO, Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO, Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO and others
Defendant:
AT&T INC., AT&T Corporation, AT&T Mobility, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. The Communication Workers of America, AFLCIO et al
as 4:2008cv00968
Plaintiff:
Archie L Williams
Defendant:
The Communication Workers of America, AFLCIO and AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. The Communication Workers of America (AFLCIO) et al.
as 4:2008mc00123
Plaintiff:
Archie L Williams
Defendant:
The Communication Workers of America (AFLCIO) and AT & T
Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO v. AT&T Video Services, Inc.
as 5:2007cv00831
Plaintiff:
Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
AT&T Video Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Communications Workers of America, Local 6182 et al v. Advocacy Incorporated
as 5:2007cv00662
Plaintiff:
Communications Workers of America, Local 6182, Communications Workers of America, Local 6182, Communications Workers of America, Local 6182 and others
Defendant:
Advocacy Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Nichols, et al v. Alcatel USA Inc
as 07-40477
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUDY NICHOLS, Individually and on behalf of the Alcatel Network Systems Salaried Retirees Benefit Program and other persons similarly situated, JERRY BROWN, Individually and on behalf of the Alcatel Network Systems Salaried Retirees Benefit Program and other persons similarly situated, ROBERT BRALEY, Individually and on behalf of the Alcatel Network Systems Salaried Retirees Benefit Program and other persons similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ALCATEL USA INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
