Cases 1 - 9 of 9
WHIGUM
as 3:2015cv00382
Plaintiff:
CONNIE FRANCES WHIGUM
Defendant:
USA, FL, DOJ AG ERIC HOLDER JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHIGUM v. USA et al.
as 3:2015cv00256
Plaintiff:
CONNIE FRANCES WHIGUM
Defendant:
USA, FL, DOJ AG ERIC HOLDER JR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WHIGUM v. HOLDER et al
as 3:2015cv00094
Plaintiff:
CONNIE FRANCES WHIGUM
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, JR, WARREN D HAMILTON, SR, USA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LARKINS v. WHIGUM
as 3:2015cv00087
Defendant:
CONNIE FRANCES WHIGUM
Plaintiff:
EVERZEAN LARKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
WHIGUM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al.
as 3:2014cv00509
Plaintiff:
CONNIE FRANCES WHIGUM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, DOJ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Connie Whigum v. USA, et al
as 12-14577
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONNIE FRANCES WHIGUM, a.k.a. Saint Connie Frances Whigum, a.k.a. Queen Saint Frances, a.k.a. King Saint Thomas, a.k.a. Queen Saint Eva Allie, a.k.a. King Saint Ephraim Albert, a.k.a. Santa Rosa Garrison Beck, a.k.a. Holley Wright Wight/White, a.k.a. Duva
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION and others
WHIGUM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2012cv00383
Plaintiff:
CONNIE FRANCES WHIGUM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF EQUAL OPPORTUNITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Connie Whigum v. State of Florida, et al
as 10-15355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONNIE FRANCES WHIGUM, a.k.a. Connie Frances Garrison Beck, a.k.a. White Whigum Jefferson Davis, a.k.a. Connie Whigum Hamilton
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, USA and WARREN D. HAMILTON, SR.
WHIGUM v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 3:2010cv00442
Plaintiff:
CONNIE FRANCES WHIGUM
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
