Cases 1 - 5 of 5
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION v. ASPEN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2017cv12281
Plaintiff:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Defendant:
ASPEN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, HUDSON SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and LANDMARK AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION v. DOERR et al
as 2:2014cv04911
Plaintiff:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Defendant:
ROBERT J. DOERR, MEADOW ROAD RESOURCES, LLC, GENERATED MATERIALS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION v. FONDIARIA SAI, S.P.A.
as 2:2011cv05416
Plaintiff:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Defendant:
FONDIARIA SAI, S.P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
CONSOLIDATED RAIL v. ALLIANCE SHIPPERS
as 2:1993cv01327
Plaintiff:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Defendant:
ALLIANCE SHIPPERS, INC.,
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
ALLIANCE SHIPPERS, INC., and MATE TRUCKING
Thirdparty_defendant:
ADVANTAGE SPECIALTIES, RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC., MATE TRUCKING and others
Counter_claimant:
MATE TRUCKING , SELECTIVE TRANS. CO. and ALL CITY PAPER
Counter_defendant:
ALLIANCE SHIPPERS, INC., and MATE TRUCKING
Cross_claimant:
MATE TRUCKING and SELECTIVE TRANS. CO.
Cross_defendant:
G.S.T. CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CONSOLIDATED RAIL v. ALLIANCE SHIPPERS
as 1:1993cv01327
Plaintiff:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Defendant:
ALLIANCE SHIPPERS, INC.,
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
ALLIANCE SHIPPERS, INC., and MATE TRUCKING
Thirdparty_defendant:
ADVANTAGE SPECIALTIES, RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC., MATE TRUCKING and others
Counter_claimant:
MATE TRUCKING , SELECTIVE TRANS. CO. and ALL CITY PAPER
Counter_defendant:
ALLIANCE SHIPPERS, INC., and MATE TRUCKING
Cross_claimant:
MATE TRUCKING and SELECTIVE TRANS. CO.
Cross_defendant:
G.S.T. CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
