Cases 1 - 10 of 11
O'Dell v. Ethicon et al
as 2:2012cv02632
Plaintiff:
Debbie O'Dell
Defendant:
Inc. Ethicon, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00079
Plaintiff:
Cathy L. Alexander
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunter v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00733
Plaintiff:
Kara M. Hunter
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morningstar et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00074
Plaintiff:
Wyonne K. Morningstar and Robert Morningstar
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heady v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00075
Plaintiff:
Tammy Jo Heady
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00734
Plaintiff:
Wanda Wells
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphree v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02630
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Murphree
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Cook, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02622
Plaintiff:
Alice J. Johnson
Defendant:
Cook, Inc., Cook Biotech, Inc., Cook Medical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00228
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mansfield v. Cook, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02621
Plaintiff:
Shelia Mansfield
Defendant:
Cook, Inc., Cook Biotech, Inc., Cook Medical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
