Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Jenkins v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2024cv01498
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Superintendent Corey Fhuere and Oregon Board of Parole and Past Prisoner Supervision
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cuevas v. Fhuere
as 6:2024cv01443
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere
Petitioner:
Santos Cuevas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nemeth v. Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC) et al
as 6:2024cv01355
Defendant:
Alex Wagner, Holly Burghardt, Ofc Michael Praska and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia Nemeth and Estate of Jesse Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DelaRosa v. Fhuere
as 6:2024cv01201
Petitioner:
Anthony Michael DelaRosa
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Templeton v. Fhuere et al
as 6:2024cv01168
Petitioner:
Mark Forest Templeton
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere and Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chin v. Fhuere et al
as 6:2024cv01124
Defendant:
Ken Jeske, Corey Fhuere, Nick Infante and others
Plaintiff:
Yeyin Chin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Templeton v. Fhuere
as 24-4059
Petitioner:
MARK FOREST TEMPLETON
Respondent:
COREY FHUERE, Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Cunningham v. Corey Fhuere
as 6:2024cv01001
Petitioner:
Bradly M Cunningham
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kalonji v. Fhuere
as 6:2024cv00960
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere
Petitioner:
Joseph Kalonji
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nealeigh v. Fhuere et al
as 6:2024cv00935
Petitioner:
Jason Leroy Nealeigh
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
