Cases 41 - 50 of 169
JORDAN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv05325
Respondent:
TAMMY FERGUSON, JOHN WETZEL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and others
Petitioner:
DAVID V. JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SOURBEER v. FERGUSON et al
as 5:2018cv04089
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, TAMMY S. FERGUSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER, PA. and others
Petitioner:
GREGORY SCOTT SOURBEER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tyner v. County of Lancaster et al
as 5:2018cv03306
Defendant:
Lori Hehnly, Cheryl Stemberger, COUNTY OF LANCASTER and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ray Tyner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyner v. County of Lancaster et al
as 3:2018cv01509
Defendant:
Lori Hehnly, Cheryl Stemberger, County of Lancaster and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ray Tyner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SOUFFRANT v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 5:2018cv02848
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and KEVIN KAUFFMAN
Petitioner:
KEVIN SOUFFRANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCPHERSON v. SUPERINTENDENT VINCENT MOONEY et al
as 5:2018cv01689
Petitioner:
BRANDON L. MCPHERSON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT VINCENT MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEISURE v. CAPOZZA et al
as 5:2018cv01261
Petitioner:
JUNIUS P. LEISURE , II
Respondent:
MARK CAPOZZA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARMER v. CAPOZZA et al
as 5:2018cv00175
Petitioner:
STEPHEN M. HARMER
Respondent:
MARK CAPOZZA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GONZALEZ v. GURMAN et al
as 5:2018cv00010
Petitioner:
DANIEL JOSHUA GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MARK GURMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WITMAN v. SMITH et al
as 5:2017cv04083
Petitioner:
ANDREW RONALD WITMAN
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
