Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
as 1:2023mc00002
Petitioner:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Respondent:
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
Amicus Curiae:
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP, REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
MENASHE et al
as 1:2020mc00046
Petitioner:
ESTATE OF YITZCHAK KOLANGI, ALYN TIRAN, LINOI SHACHAR-SABACH and others
Respondent:
COVINGTON & BURLING, LLP
TERRELL v. MCDONALD'S CORPORATION et al
as 1:2016cv00833
Plaintiff:
LORI E. TERRELL
Defendant:
MCDONALD'S CORPORATION, STEPHEN J. EASTERBROOK, FRED TILLMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
RODRIGUEZ et al v. SHULMAN et al
as 1:2011cv01183
Plaintiff:
IRENE D. RODRIGUEZ and ISIDORO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
DOUGLAS SHULMAN, WILLIAM J. WILKINS, DEBORAH A. BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
CHAPMAN v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT et al
as 1:2009cv02107
Plaintiff:
J. TODD CHAPMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, EDWARD G. RENDELL, THOMAS CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
YOUNG v. COVINGTON & BURLING, LLP et al
as 1:2009cv00464
Plaintiff:
YOLANDA YOUNG
Defendant:
COVINGTON & BURLING, LLP, PATRICK DAVIES, STEVE ANTHONY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FICKEN et al v. GOLDEN et al
as 1:2009cv00345
Plaintiff:
IVAN FICKEN and CIPRIAN IVANOF
Defendant:
OLIVIA GOLDEN, ROSE MONTGOMERY DAVID, EMMANUAL MBADIUGHA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FICKEN v. GOLDEN et al
as 1:2009mc00071
Petitioner:
IVAN FICKEN
Respondent:
OLIVIA GOLDEN, ROSE MONTGOMERY DAVID, EMMANUAL MBADIUGHA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
STURDZA v. UNITED ARAB EMIRATES et al
as 1:2008cv01642
Plaintiff:
ELENA STURDZA
Defendant:
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES, ANGELOS DEMETRIOU & ASSOCIATES, ANGELOS DEMETRIOU and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
