Cases 1 - 5 of 5
PPL EnergyPlus, LLC, et al v. Lee Solomon, et al
as 13-4501
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PPL ENERGYPLUS LLC and CALPINE ENERGY SERVICES LP
Plaintiff - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
PPL MONTOUR LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
LEE A. SOLOMON, JEANNE M. FOX, JOSEPH FIORDALISO and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
HESS NEWARK LLC and CPV POWER DEVELOPMENT INC
PPL Energy Plus, LLC, et al v. Lee Solomon, et al
as 13-4394
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PPL ENERGYPLUS LLC and CALPINE ENERGY SERVICES LP
Defendant - Appellee:
LEE A. SOLOMON, JEANNE M. FOX, JOSEPH FIORDALISO and others
Defendant - Appellant:
HESS NEWARK LLC
Defendant - Intervenor:
CPV POWER DEVELOPMENT INC
PPL EnergyPlus, LLC, et al v. Lee Solomon, et al
as 13-4330
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PPL ENERGYPLUS LLC and CALPINE ENERGY SERVICES, L.P.
Defendant - Appellee:
LEE A. SOLOMON, in his official capacity as President of the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, JEANNE M. FOX, In her official capacity as Commissioner of the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, JOSEPH FIORDALISO and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
CPV POWER DEVELOPMENT INC
PPL ENERGYPLUS, LLC et al v. SOLOMON et al
as 3:2011cv00745
Plaintiff:
PPL ENERGYPLUS, LLC , PPL BRUNNER ISLAND, LLC , PPL HOLTWOOD, LLC and others
Defendant:
LEE A. SOLOMON , JEANNE M. FOX , JOSEPH L. FIORDALISO and others
Movant:
PJM INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMER COALITION and NEW JERSEY, DIVISION OF RATE COUNSEL
Intervenor_defendant:
CPV POWER DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
PPL ENERGYPLUS, LLC et al v. SOLOMON et al
as 2:2011cv00745
Plaintiff:
PPL ENERGYPLUS, LLC , PPL BRUNNER ISLAND, LLC , PPL HOLTWOOD, LLC and others
Defendant:
LEE A. SOLOMON , JEANNE M. FOX , JOSEPH L. FIORDALISO and others
Movant:
PJM INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMER COALITION , CPV Power Development, Inc. and NEW JERSEY, DIVISION OF RATE COUNSEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
