Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BENBOW v. TRANSFLO TERMINAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv02684
Plaintiff:
Keith Benbow
Defendant:
Transflo Terminal Services, Inc., CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INC. and JOHN DOE(S) 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HINES v. MONKEY WRENCH AUTO SERVICE INC. et al
as 2:2020cv06214
Defendant:
MONKEY WRENCH AUTO BODY D/B/A DOUGHERTY AUTO BODY doing business as DOUGHERTY AUTO BODY, DOUGHERTY AUTO BODY, MONKEY WRENCH AUTO SERVICE INC. D/B/A DOUGHERTY AUTO BODY doing business as DOUGHERTY AUTO BODY and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HINES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00113
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INC.
Plaintiff:
LUCIOUS JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INC.
as 2:2018cv05518
Defendant:
CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INC.
Plaintiff:
LUCIOUS JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BUSBY v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv04314
Plaintiff:
LARRY BUSBY
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. and CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CONCIO v. CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01862
Plaintiff:
FRANK D. CONCIO
Defendant:
CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INC. and RICHARD DEJESUS JIMENEZ MUNOZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WELH v. MANFREDI TRANSPORTATION, CO., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv02873
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH WELH
Defendant:
MANFREDI TRANSPORTATION, CO., INC., CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
