Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Martin v. Lawrence Co. Jail et al
as 1:2019cv00015
Defendant:
Sgt. Jamie Mahar, John Myers and Lawrence Co. Jail
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin et al v. Core Civic et al
as 1:2017cv00112
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Martin and Louis Rodriguez
Defendant:
Core Civic, Cherry Lindamood, Danny Casteel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Martin v. TN, et al
as 14-6126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS LEE MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and CHRISTI THOMPSON, District Attorney
Martin v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2014cv00115
Petitioner:
Curtis Lee Martin
Respondent:
State of Tennessee and Lawrence County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2014cv00112
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Martin
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Christi Thompson and District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2014cv00110
Petitioner:
Curtis Lee Martin
Respondent:
State of Tennessee , TDOC and Lawrence County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Curtis Martin v. Department of Probation, et al
as 14-5885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS LEE MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, JAMIE STAGGS and ANGELA SWANSON
Martin v. Tennessee Bureau of Investigation
as 1:2014cv00090
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Martin
Defendant:
Tennessee Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2014cv00081
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Martin
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, District Attorney's Office and Christi Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Department of Probation et al
as 1:2014cv00075
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Martin
Defendant:
Department of Probation, Jamie Staggs and Angela Swanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
