Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hamm et al v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al
as 8:2020cv00367
Defendant:
Chattem, Inc., Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kiley Hamm and Johnna Hamm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 8:2020cv00334
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation and CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dana Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
County of Douglas, State of Nebraska v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 8:2019cv00049
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
County of Douglas, State of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 8:2018cv00203
Defendant:
Actavis Pharma, Inc., Actavis, LLC, Allergan PLC and others
Plaintiff:
Omaha Tribe of Nebraska, Santee Sioux Tribe of the Sioux Nation of the State of Nebraska and Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
County of Knox, State of Nebraska v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 8:2018cv00181
Defendant:
Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Allergan PLC and others
Plaintiff:
County of Knox, State of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Ponca Tribe of Nebraska v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 8:2018cv00180
Defendant:
Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Allergan PLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ponca Tribe of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Wegener et al v. AXA Seguros, S.A. DE C.V.
as 4:2016cv03175
Defendant:
AXA Seguros, S.A. DE C.V.
Plaintiff:
Kool Agricultural SPR DE RL DE CV, L. Jerome Pribil and Michael J. Wegener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Kaufman v. CVS Pharmacy et al
as 4:2009cv03087
Plaintiff:
Sharon Kaufman
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy and Davaco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
