Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Hyams v. CVS Health Corporation
as 4:2018cv06278
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation (formerly known as CVS Caremark Corporation), CVS RX Services, Inc., CVS Pharmacy Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Hyams and Regine Duhon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Garza, Jr. v. CVS Caremark Corporation
as 2:2016cv00040
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation
Plaintiff:
Vidal Garza, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Slay v. CVS Caremark Corporation
as 1:2015cv01315
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Slay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 1:2015at00707
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation and Mark A. Slay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Sherih Ibrahim v. CVS Rx Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06372
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Health Corporation, CVS Rx Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sherih Ibrahim
Slay v. CVS Caremark Corporation
as 1:2014cv01416
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Slay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Slay v. CVS Caremark Corporation
as 1:2014at00681
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation
Plaintiff:
Mark A Slay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Susan Howard et al v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv04009
Plaintiff:
Susan Howard , Roselyn Wooden and Isabel Alexander
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation , CVS Pharmacy Inc , CVS Pharmacy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Susan Howard et al v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv04748
Plaintiff:
Isabel Alexander, Susan Howard and Roselyn Wooden
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and others
Ortiz et al v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05859
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ortiz and Gail Miller
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation and CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
