Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Tauber v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv11319
Plaintiff:
Ronald Tauber
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Corporation, CVS Caremark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Robertson et al v. Breakthrough Towing, LLC
as 2:2019cv10266
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, Breakthrough Towing, LLC, Michael Dickerson and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bates, Olivia Robertson and Leng Vang
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Hunter v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv13139
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Hunter
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation
Leach v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv13100
Plaintiff:
Dorrie Leach
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation and CVS Michigan, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
SFD Enterprise, LLC vs. CVS Caremark Corporation, et al.
as 2:2010cv10769
Plaintiff:
SFD Enterprise, LLC
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation and Symtek, Inc.
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. Advanced Healthcare Distributors, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv14359
Plaintiff:
Innovation Ventures, LLC
Defendant:
Advanced Healthcare Distributors, LLC, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and CVS Caremark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Type:
Other Statutes
Michigan, State of v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv00776
Plaintiff:
Michigan, State of
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Kmart Holding Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Lansing, City of et al v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv00778
Plaintiff:
Lansing, City of, Dickinson Press Inc and Scott Murphy
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Caremark, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Rogow v. CVS Caremark Corporation
as 2:2009cv10783
Plaintiff:
Emily Rogow
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
