Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Lawtis Rhoden, et al v. Stephen Mayberg, et al
as 11-15235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWTIS DONALD RHODEN
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN W. MAYBERG, Director of The Calfornia Dept. of Mental Health, NORM KRAMER, BEN MCCLAIN, Acting Director of Coalinga State Hospital and others
Vasquez v. Ahlin et al
as 1:2009cv00196
Plaintiff:
George Vasquez
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin, Cynthia A. Radavsky, Montoyo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Omega Hardy v. Cynthia A. Radavsky et al
as 2:2008cv07521
Plaintiff:
Michael Omega Hardy
Defendant:
Cynthia A. Radavsky, Dana Putnam, Christopher North and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Sanchez v. Ahlin et al
as 1:2009cv00201
Plaintiff:
Jesse Sanchez
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin, Cynthia A. Radavsky, Montoyo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sisneroz et al v. Ahlin et al
as 1:2008cv01358
Plaintiff:
Frank Enepi Sisneroz, George Vasquez, Frank Romas Sumahit and others
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin, Cynthia A. Radavsky, Montoyo and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Angulo v. Ahlin et al
as 1:2009cv00198
Plaintiff:
Michael Angulo
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin, Cynthia A. Radavsky, Montoyo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sumahit v. Ahlin et al
as 1:2009cv00197
Plaintiff:
Frank R. Sumahit
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin, Cynthia A. Radavsky, Montoyo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Languein v. Ahlin et al
as 1:2009cv00199
Plaintiff:
Michael Languein
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin, Cynthia A. Radavsky, Montoyo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sisneroz et al v. Ahlin et al
as 2:2008cv01697
Plaintiff:
Frank Enepi Sisneroz, George Vasquez, Frank Romas Sumahit and others
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin, Cynthia A. Radavsky, Montoyo and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chavez v. Ahlin et al
as 1:2009cv00202
Plaintiff:
Andrew Chavez
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin, Cynthia A. Radavsky, Montoyo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
