Cases
ONDA, et al v. BLM, et al
as 23-35461
Plaintiff / Appellee: OREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION, AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Defendant / Appellant: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and BARRY BUSHUE, State Director, BLM Oregon/Washington
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: CAHILL RANCHES, INC., an Oregon corporation, ROCKING CLUB CATTLE, LLC, V BOX LAND & LIVESTOCK, INC. and others
ONDA, et al v. BLM, et al
as 23-35109
Plaintiff / Appellee: OREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION, AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Defendant: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, THERESA M. HANLEY, State Director, BLM Oregon/Washington, DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: CAHILL RANCHES, INC., an Oregon corporation, MACKENZIE RANCH, LLC, LAIRD LAND COMPANY, LLC and others
ONDA, et al v. BLM, et al
as 23-35101
Plaintiff / Appellee: OREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION, AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Defendant: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, THERESA M. HANLEY, State Director, BLM Oregon/Washington, DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: MACKENZIE RANCH, LLC, LAIRD LAND COMPANY, LLC, COW CREEK RANCH, INC. and others
Cahill Ranches, Inc. v. Bureau of Land Management We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01363
Plaintiff: Cahill Ranches, Inc.
Defendant: Bureau of Land Management
Intervenor Defendant: Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Cahill Ranches, Inc. v. Bureau Of Land Management We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00960
Defendant: Bureau of Land Management
Plaintiff: Cahill Ranches, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?