Cases 1 - 10 of 65
United States of America v. Zoulin Cai
as 2:2024cv02619
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Zoulin Cai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205 Garnishment
Bai et al v. CMB Export Infrastructure Investment Group 48, LP et al
as 2:2024at00303
Plaintiff:
Shi Bai, Jing Cai, Yikun Cai and others
Defendant:
CMB Export Infrastructure Investment Group 48, LP, CMB Export LLC, NK Immigration Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bai et al v. CMB Export Infrastructure Investment Group 48, LP et al
as 2:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Shi Bai, Jing Cai, Yikun Cai and others
Defendant:
CMB Export Infrastructure Investment Group 48, LP, CMB Export LLC, NK Immigration Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cai, et al. v. Eargo, Inc., et al.
as 23-3470
Plaintiff / Appellant:
XIAOBIN CAI and IBEW LOCAL 353 PENSION PLAN
Defendant / Appellee:
EARGO, INC., CHRISTIAN GORMSEN, ADAM LAPONIS and others
In re Naturalization Ceremony 8/30/2023
as 3:2023mc80216
In Re:
Naturalization Ceremony, Eugene Atienza Acosta, Roksana Akhter and others
Yanfei Cai v. Secretary of Dept. of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2023cv03277
Petitioner:
Yanfei Cai
Respondent:
Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, Director of USCIS, Los Angeles District Director of the USCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
USA v. Cau Hong
as 23-50038
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CAU HONG, AKA Cay A., AKA Hong, AKA A. Cau Hong, AKA Calvin Hong, AKA Cau Kevin Hong, AKA Kevin Calvin Hong, AKA Kevin Cau Hong, AKA Kevin Cay Hong, AKA Thai Binh Hong
In Re Naturalization Ceremony 2/11/2023
as 3:2023mc80027
In Re:
In Re Naturalization Ceremony, Milan Aggarwal, Namrata Saidas Naik and others
Cai, et al. v. Garland
as 23-186
Petitioner:
NENGHUI CAI, HE SHAO QIN and XU CAO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
