Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Rigsby v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2021cv00575
Defendant:
LNU FNU, California State Of and Oklahoma State of
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ray Rigsby, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jimenez v. California State Of et al
as 5:2017cv01331
Plaintiff:
Felicito Avendano Jimenez
Defendant:
California State Of, Oklahoma State of, Texas Transport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 5:2016cv00205
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ryan
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, Keith Ivens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prather v. California Governor of et al
as 5:2012cv01284
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Defendant:
California Governor of and Fresno Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prather v. Attorney General of the State of California et al
as 5:2012cv01283
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of California and Fresno Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankins v. California Dept. of Corrections et al
as 5:2012cv01142
Plaintiff:
Deshawn A Rankins
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Corrections Corporation of America and R Apple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelso v. Luna et al
as 5:2010cv00040
Plaintiff:
John Donald Kelso
Defendant:
Carlos Luna, California Department of Corrections Directors, California Department of Mental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Escamilla v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2009cv00134
Plaintiff:
Carlos Escamilla
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, The Corrections Corporation of America and Norfork Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
