Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00345
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Bilecki v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 5:2010cv00763
Plaintiff:
Mark N Bilecki
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motors Sales USA Inc and Toyota Motor Manufacturing De Baja California S De RL De CV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
California Well Service, LLC et al v Stephens, et al
as 4:2010cv00128
Plaintiff:
California Well Service, LLC, California Well Service, LLC, James Bentley and others
Defendant:
William F Stephens, First Quality Oilfield Equipment, LLC, North Star Falcon Industries, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Kelso v. Luna et al
as 5:2010cv00040
Plaintiff:
John Donald Kelso
Defendant:
Carlos Luna, California Department of Corrections Directors, California Department of Mental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Escamilla v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2009cv00134
Plaintiff:
Carlos Escamilla
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, The Corrections Corporation of America and Norfork Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Osburn v. Douglas Furniture of California, L.L.C. et al
as 4:2007cv00260
Plaintiff:
Tony Osburn, Tony Osburn, Tony Osburn and others
Defendant:
Douglas Furniture of California, L.L.C., Douglas Furniture of California, L.L.C., Mor Furniture for Less, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Little et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2005cv01397
Defendant:
Eni Petroleum Company Inc, BP America Production Company, Burlington Resources Offshore Inc and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Randy L Little and Lanis G Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
