Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Owens v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, R. Polk, Barns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkerson v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01436
Plaintiff:
Antoine Wilkerson
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Camacho and Monday
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lance Braham v. Camacho et al
as 1:2023cv24146
Plaintiff:
Lance Braham
Defendant:
W. Gonzalez Camacho, John Doe, Warden Boan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Camacho v. United States Of America
as 1:2023cv23651
Plaintiff:
Ismael Camacho
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Sherman v. Camacho et al
as 3:2023cv00969
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jamal Sherman
Defendant:
C. M. Camacho, Warden Polk, Christina Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Camacho-Villanueva v. Dixon
as 2:2023cv14186
Plaintiff:
Justo Camacho-Villanueva
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramos v. United States of America
as 8:2023cv01112
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Camacho Ramos
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Camacho v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2022cv00568
Petitioner:
Jose Valencia Camacho
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Prater v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00888
Plaintiff:
Randall T. Prater
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Walter A. McNeil, Harry K. Singletary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fullard v. Robinson et al
as 3:2022cv00672
Plaintiff:
Wesley T. Fullard
Defendant:
A. Robinson, M. Rossinsheld and J. Camacho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
