Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Camacho v. Sabaini et al
as 1:2021cv03464
Defendant:
Unknown and Unnamed Department of Homeland Security Agents and Officers, Anthony Sabaini, Fernando Zambrano and others
Plaintiff:
Marco Camacho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Montalvo et al v. Allstate Insurance Co. et al
as 4:2020cv04046
Plaintiff:
Alma R Madrid and Hector Montalvo
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Co. and Fernando Camacho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06196
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05231
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Safari Childcare Inc et al v. Penny et al
as 1:2017cv08547
Plaintiff:
Safari Childcare Inc and James Ourth
Defendant:
Shirley Penny, Denice Murray, Carol Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv03317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rodriguez et al v. City Of Berwyn Illinois et al
as 1:2016cv05106
Plaintiff:
Rodriguez, DeJesus Dimitri, Vanessa Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
City Of Berwyn Illinois, James Ritz, KARLAS ROBINZINE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodard v. City of Chicago, The et al
as 1:2013cv04463
Defendant:
City of Chicago, The, Carmelo Camacho, David Alcala and others
Plaintiff:
Derreck Woodard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Camacho v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2012cv03163
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Camacho
Defendant:
City of Chicago, R. Bell and R B Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
