Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Campbell v. McDonough
as 24-1760
Claimant:
RICHARD M. CAMPBELL
Respondent:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Harris-Campbell v. Treasury
as 24-1470
Petitioner:
DENISE LAVETTE HARRIS-CAMPBELL
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
CAMPBELL v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00205
Petitioner:
BARBARA CAMPBELL
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Dawson v. US
as 23-1971
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
McKinney v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
as 23-1930
Petitioner:
HUGH CAMPBELL MCKINNEY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Dawson v. US
as 23-1927
Plaintiff:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON DIAL, TRAVIS DIAL, M. LEE JUENEMANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Dawson v. US
as 23-1923
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DIAL, TRAVIS DIAL, M. LEE JUENEMANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
ATS Ford Drive Investment, LLC v. US
as 23-1760
Plaintiff:
ATS FORD DRIVE INVESTMENT, LLC, ALEXANDER AUTO AND RADIATOR REPAIR, RONALD MORRIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GODBY PROPERTIES, LP, REZIN FAMILY INVESTMENTS LLS, Greenstone Asset Management, c/o, BRIAN L. SCHOONVELD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
CAMPBELL v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00272
Petitioner:
STEELE CAMPBELL
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
