Cases 1 - 10 of 15
USA v. John Canlas
as 22-1117
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN AGOT CANLAS
Ruben Garcia, Jr. v. K. Seeley, et al
as 19-56128
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN AND JANE DOES, Employed in Different Post Assignments, Medical Service Providers; Appeals Coordinator Staff; and Medical Health Service Provider, R. WALKER, D.O., R. OLSON, Inmate Appeals Coordinator and others
Defendant:
M. MARTINEZ
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUBEN DARIO GARCIA, Jr.
Albert Robinson v. Adam Kandulski, et al
as 19-1330
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH ALTON, Nurse, MICHAEL P. MILLETTE, Physician Assistant, JOCQUE BENOIT, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT REGINALD ROBINSON
Albert Robinson v. Adam Kandulski, et al
as 19-1288
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH ALTON, Nurse, MICHAEL P. MILLETTE, Physician Assistant, JOCQUE BENOIT, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT REGINALD ROBINSON
Albert Robinson v. Adam Kandulski, et al
as 19-1221
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH ALTON, Nurse, MICHAEL P. MILLETTE, Physician Assistant, JOCQUE BENOIT, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT REGINALD ROBINSON
BOXIT, LLC v. DESCHENES et al
as 1:2016cv00707
Plaintiff:
BOXIT, LLC
Defendant:
FRANCOIS DESCHENES, OLIVIA CANLAS and MEOWBOX, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04727
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Canlas v. United States Pacific Fleet et al
as 1:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Canlas
Defendant:
United States Pacific Fleet, United States Pacific Command, John Does 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
