Cases 41 - 49 of 49
RHUDE v. CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. et al
as 1:2015cv01618
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. and CAPITAL ONE SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff:
CLIFF RHUDE
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Yoder et al v. Capital One Bank USA NA et al
as 3:2012cv00560
Plaintiff:
Barbara Ann Yoder, Mark Lynn Yoder and Monte Edwin Mueller
Defendant:
Capital One Bank USA NA , Loena D Arnold , Joe V Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BAKER v. CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.
as 1:2012cv00971
Plaintiff:
BETH A. BAKER
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
United States of America v. Birtwhistle et al
as 3:2011cv00416
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kathy L Birtwhistle, Cach LLC of Colorado, Capital One Bank USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00184
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Nettrouer et al
as 3:2010cv00376
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Chelsea R Nettrouer, Capital One Bank USA NA, NCO Financial Systems Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
STATE OF INDIANA v. STROH et al
as 3:2010cv00071
Defendant:
ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A., DAVIESS COUNTY, INDIANA and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
STATE OF INDIANA v. STROH et al
as 1:2010cv00570
Defendant:
ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A., DAVIESS COUNTY, INDIANA and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. STROH et al
as 3:2009cv00031
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
EDWARD F. STROH, SHERRY L. BROWN and CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
