Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Novi Footwear International Co. Limited v. Earth Opco LLC, et al
as 22-1662
Plaintiff / Appellee: NOVI FOOTWEAR INTERNATIONAL CO. LIMITED
Defendant / Appellant: EARTH OPCO LLC, WINDSONG CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC and WILLIAM SWEEDLER
Defendant: SECOND AVENUE CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC
WM Capital Partners 53, LLC v. Barreras, Inc.
as 22-1675
Plaintiff / Appellant: WM CAPITAL PARTNERS, 53 LLC.
Defendant / Appellee: BARRERAS, INC.
Defendant: GABLES TOWERS, INC.
Northeast Patients Group, et al v. Figueroa
as 21-1759
Plaintiff / Appellee: NORTHEAST PATIENTS GROUP, d/b/a Wellness Connection of Maine and HIGH STREET CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC
Defendant / Appellant: KIRSTEN FIGUEROA, in her official capacity as Commissioner of Maine Department of Administrative and Financial Services
Defendant: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES and UNITED CANNABIS PATIENTS AND CAREGIVERS OF MAINE
Northeast Patients Group, et al v. United Cannabis Patients and Caregivers of Maine
as 21-1719
Plaintiff / Appellee: NORTHEAST PATIENTS GROUP, d/b/a Wellness Connection of Maine and HIGH STREET CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES and KIRSTEN FIGUEROA, in her official capacity as Commissioner of Maine Department of Administrative and Financial Services
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED CANNABIS PATIENTS AND CAREGIVERS OF MAINE
SEC v. Hamburger
as 19-2043
Defendant: Z. PAUL JURBUERG, individually and, d/b/a Brookline Capital Partners, Inc., JONATHAN MORRONE, individually and, d/b/a JM International, Inc., MAY'S INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and others
3Rd Party Defendant: ONEIGHTY C TECHNOLOGIES and DAVID SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellee: US SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant: BRETT HAMBURGER, d/b/a JCBH Consulting, LLC
SEC v. Jurberg
as 19-2007
Defendant: ANTHONY ORTH, individually and, d/b/a Grand Traverse Equities, Inc., JONATHAN MORRONE, individually and, d/b/a JM International, Inc., MAY'S INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and others
3Rd Party Defendant: ONEIGHTY C TECHNOLOGIES and DAVID SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellee: US SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant: Z. PAUL JURBUERG, individually and, d/b/a Brookline Capital Partners, Inc. and Z. PAUL JURBERG, individually and, d/b/a Brookline Capital Partners, Inc.
SEC v. Morrone We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-2006
Defendant: Z. PAUL JURBUERG, individually and, d/b/a Brookline Capital Partners, Inc., MAY'S INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, ANTHONY ORTH, individually and, d/b/a Grand Traverse Equities, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Defendant: ONEIGHTY C TECHNOLOGIES and DAVID SMITH
Defendant / Appellant: JONATHAN MORRONE, individually and, d/b/a JM International, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellee: US SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WM Capital Partners 53, LLC v. Barreras, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1364
Defendant / Appellee: GABLES TOWERS, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee: WM CAPITAL PARTNERS, 53 LLC.
Defendant / Appellant: BARRERAS, INC.
Sepulveda-Medina v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, et al
as 19-1052
Plaintiff: ANTONIO VELEZ-MARTINEZ, NAYDA ROSA ALVAREZ-MORALES, ISRAEL RODRIGUEZ-VELAZQUEZ and others
Defendant: ISLAND FINANCE CORPORATION, COOPERATIVA DE AHORRO Y CREDITO DE CIALES, ROOSEVELT CAYMAN ASSETS COMPANY I and others
Defendant / Appellee: FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, OPERATING PARTNERS COMPANY, LLC., UNITED STATES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: EDDIE MANUEL SEPULVEDA-MEDINA
Sun Capital Partners III, LP, et al v. New England Teamsters & Trucki, et al
as 19-1002
Plaintiff / Appellant: SUN CAPITAL PARTNERS III, LP, SUN CAPITAL PARTNERS IV, LP and SUN CAPITAL PARTNERS III QP, LP
Defendant / Appellee: NEW ENGLAND TEAMSTERS & TRUCKING INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
3Rd Party Defendant: SCOTT BRASS HOLDING CORP. and SUN SCOTT BRASS, LLC
Petitioner: PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?