Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Ervin v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv03926
Plaintiff:
James S. Ervin, Sr.
Defendant:
E. Williams, G. Zykan, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Prak et al v. Skaf et al
as 3:2023cv03403
Plaintiff:
Captain Prak, Sarah Angerillo and Emma Petro
Defendant:
Khalid Skaf, Rana Skaf, Cook Futures LLC and others
Wilcox v. Administrative Staff et al
as 3:2023cv03342
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wilcox
Defendant:
Administrative Staff, AW McCaffee, Warden Spoul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lowman v. Collins et al
as 3:2023cv02484
Plaintiff:
Joseph D Lowman
Defendant:
Captain Collins, Sgt. Moore, Sgt Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mayor v. Tharp et al
as 3:2023cv01347
Plaintiff:
Richard D Mayor
Defendant:
Chris Tharp, Captain Riding, Kyle Napp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Lakin et al
as 3:2022cv00887
Plaintiff:
David F. Brown
Defendant:
John D. Lakin, Captain Tharp, Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Vick v. USP Marion et al
as 3:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Delanio Maurice Vick
Defendant:
USP Marion, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden Sproul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Headrick v. Chambers et al
as 3:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Headrick
Defendant:
Sgt. Chambers, C/O Brown, C/O Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfe v. Sproul et al
as 3:2021cv01471
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Wolfe, II
Defendant:
Dan Sproul, E. Harbison, Randall Pass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greer v. Madison County Jail et al
as 3:2020cv01323
Defendant:
Nurse Practitioner, Captain Ridings, Tony Court and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Greer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
