Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 1:2021cv09101
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, PREMERA and Premera Blue Cross, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Farkas, M.D. v. Carefirst of Maryland, Inc.
as 1:2017cv04128
Defendant:
Carefirst of Maryland, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Farkas, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Barr, Sternberg, Moss, Lawrence, Silver & Munson, P.C. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2016cv00096
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama, Caring for Montanans, Inc., Cambia Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Barr, Sternberg, Moss, Lawrence, Silver & Munson, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Conway et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 1:2015cv05539
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Conway , Cory Musselman , The San Antonio Orthopaedic Group, LLP and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem, Inc., Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2014md02516
Defendant:
Teva Women's Health, Inc., Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
In Re:
Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Pirelli Armstrong Retiree Medical Benefits Trust, Operating Engineers Local 312 Health and Welfare Trust, A.F. of L. - A.G.C. Buildings Trade Welfare Plan and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Louisiana Health Service Indemnity Company
Claimant:
Lonny DiTella
Interested Party:
Gyma Laboratories of America, Inc., PAR Pharmaceutical, Inc., Aetna Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Generic Pharmaceutical Association
Cause Of Action: MDL 2516 In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
