Cases filed in District of Columbia
MOHAMMED v. COOPER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01475
Plaintiff: ABDUL MOHAMMED
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER COOPER, BERYL A. HOWELL, JAMES BOASBERG and others
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
LAWYERS UNITED INC. et al v. ROBERTS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv03222
Defendant: JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., AMIT P MEHTA, JON S TIGAR and others
Not Classified By Court: JEFFREY S WHITE, RU D MOSS and EVELY AIMEE DE JESUS
Plaintiff: LAWYERS UNITED INC, LAWYERS UNITED INC. and EVELYN AIMEE DE JESUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PARKER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01999
Plaintiff: CARL J. PARKER
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, LEIGH WILSON, FATIMA JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
PATCHAK v. KEMPTHORNE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv01331
Plaintiff: DAVID PATCHAK
Defendant: DIRK KEMPTHORNE and CARL J. ARTMAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
CHUGACH REGIONAL RESOURCES COMMISSION v. KEMPTHORNE et al
as 1:2008cv00200
Plaintiff: CHUGACH REGIONAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
Defendant: DIRK A. KEMPTHORNE and CARL J. ARTMAN
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
ST. CROIX CHIPPEWA INDIANS OF WISCONSIN v. KEMPTHORNE et al
as 1:2007cv02210
Plaintiff: ST. CROIX CHIPPEWA INDIANS OF WISCONSIN
Defendant: DIRK KEMPTHORNE and CARL J. ARTMAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2007cv01950
Plaintiff: CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DIRK KEMPTHORNE and CARL J. ARTMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?