Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv07979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Crawley v. City Of Rockford et al
as 3:2011cv50308
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Crawley
Defendant:
City Of Rockford, Rebecca Anderson, Joshua Arthur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickey et al v. Schwarm et al
as 3:2011cv00385
Plaintiff:
Penny Hickey and Lawrence Hickey
Defendant:
Gene Schwarm, William Becker, Ericka Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene-McCann v. Ogle County et al
as 3:2011cv50125
Plaintiff:
Valorie R Greene-McCann
Defendant:
Ogle County , Michael R. Harn , Gregory A. Beitel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Auten v. Steigmann et al
as 3:2011cv03013
Plaintiff:
Dawn Auten
Defendant:
Robert J Steigmann , M. Carol Pope , Thomas R Appleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Pavlin et al v. County et al
as 3:2009cv50154
Plaintiff:
Jerome Pavlin, Jerome Pavlin, Jerome Pavlin and others
Defendant:
McHenry County, Keith Nygren, Jeremy Bruketta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pro's Sports Bar & Grill, Inc. et al v. City of Country Club Hills et al
as 1:2008cv06031
Plaintiff:
Pro's Sports Bar & Grill, Inc., Tharon Bradley, Carla Nelson and others
Defendant:
City of Country Club Hills and Dwight Welch
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bock et al v. Pruitt et al
as 3:2008cv00603
Plaintiff:
Shannon Bock and Tammy Trimm
Defendant:
Carla R. Pruitt, Seth E. Stinnett, Officer Cole and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hill v. Potter et al
as 1:2007cv06835
Plaintiff:
Carla Hill
Defendant:
John Potter, Patrick KaVaugh, James Fiscauldo and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
