Cases 11 - 20 of 22
K.M. et al v. Hickenlooper, Jr., et al
as 1:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
J. (I) M. , B. J. M. , J. M. and others
Defendant:
John W. Hickenlooper , Colorado Department of Human Services , Reggie Bicha and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
v. Smith et al
as 1:2013cv00968
Defendant:
Kevin Smith, Carla Havard, Terri Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Havard et al
as 1:2013cv00967
Plaintiff:
Kevin Smith
Defendant:
Carla Havard, Terri Baker, Mr. A's Restaurant and Lounge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Havard et al
as 1:2013cv00969
Plaintiff:
Kevin Smith
Defendant:
Carla Havard, Terri Baker, Mr. A's Restaurant and Lounge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guerrero-Parada et al v. Turza et al
as 1:2011cv00740
Plaintiff:
Sugey Guerrero-Parada and Carla Soto-Guerrero
Defendant:
Steve Turza, Christopher Carter and Vanessa Hips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gammons v. City of Denver, Colorado et al
as 1:2010cv01598
Plaintiff:
Deneen R. Gammons
Defendant:
City of Denver, Colorado, John W. Hickenlooper, Denver City Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gammons v. City of Denver, Colorado et al
as 1:2010cv00506
Plaintiff:
Deneen R. Gammons
Defendant:
City of Denver, Colorado, John W. Hickenlooper, Denver City Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meza v. City of Aurora, Colorado et al
as 1:2010cv00330
Plaintiff:
Carla R. Meza
Defendant:
City of Aurora, Colorado, James (I) Waselkow, James Waselkow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
