Cases 1 - 10 of 13
CARNES v. GORE et al
as 1:2022cv02521
Plaintiff:
LISA KAREN MARIE CARNES
Defendant:
ALBERT - GORE, WARREN ELIZABETH, PEGGY CATERWARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARNES v. BREY
as 1:2022cv02519
Defendant:
PATTY BREY and LISA CARNE
Plaintiff:
LISA KAREN MARIE CARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARNES v. U.S. ARMY et al
as 1:2022cv02520
Plaintiff:
LISA KAREN MARIE CARNES
Defendant:
U.S. ARMY, ARMY RESEARCH, FORT BLISS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ETIENNE v. SANDERS et al
as 1:2022cv02509
Defendant:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
CARNES v. CLINTON et al
as 1:2022cv02432
Plaintiff:
LISA KAREN MARIE CARNES and KAREN MARIE PRICE
Defendant:
BILL CLINTON and HILLARY CLINTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CARNES v. GORE COMMUNITY et al
as 1:2022cv02345
Plaintiff:
LISA KAREN MARIE CARNES
Defendant:
GORE COMMUNITY, ALBERT GORING and DAVID HARDEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PUTMAN v. SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE et al
as 1:2018cv02904
Defendant:
CHARLES GRASSLEY, THOMAS E. CARNES, BILL NELSON and others
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR PUTMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN ALLEN v. MUELLER et al
as 1:2018cv00150
Plaintiff:
HAROLD WILLIAM VAN ALLEN
Defendant:
ROBERT MUELLER, JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., JOHN J. FASO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INTEGRITY ADVANCE, LLC et al v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
as 1:2016cv00872
Plaintiff:
INTEGRITY ADVANCE, LLC and JAMES R. CARNES
Defendant:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DENNIS v. DEAL et al
as 1:2015mc00781
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE DENNIS
Defendant:
NATHAN DEAL, SANDRA DEAL, TASHA MOSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
