Cases 41 - 50 of 192
Smith v. Carr et al
as 1:2022cv01233
Plaintiff:
Carlton Smith
Defendant:
Christopher Carr and John Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graves v. Carr et al
as 1:2022cv01212
Petitioner:
Scottie Lee Graves
Respondent:
Christopher M. Carr, The Attorney General of the State of Georgia,, Patrick Labat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maddox v. Bowen et al
as 1:2022cv01151
Petitioner:
Giovonnte Maddox
Respondent:
Tommy Bowen and Christopher Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wymer v. Kemp et al
as 1:2022cv01127
Plaintiff:
James Wymer
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Gov. Brain Kemp, Dr. Azores-Gococo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littlejohn v. Brasher et al
as 1:2022cv00824
Plaintiff:
Timothy Littlejohn
Defendant:
The Honorable Christopher Brasher, Cathlene "Tina" Robinson, The Honorable Kelly Ellerbe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battle v. Madex et al
as 1:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Terrel Battle
Defendant:
Melandy Madex, Captain Poole, Dr. Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORGAN v. DOZIER et al
as 7:2021cv00164
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO LAMAR MORGAN
Defendant:
GREGORY C DOZIER, CHRISTOPHER CARR, MICHAEL BARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. USA
as 1:2021cv05229
Petitioner:
Quashun Demarcus Carr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McDaniel v. Carr
as 4:2021cv00240
Petitioner:
Robert Steven McDaniel
Respondent:
Christopher Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McDaniel v. Carr
as 4:2021cv00356
Petitioner:
Robert Steven McDaniel
Respondent:
Christopher Carr
Not Classified By Court:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
