Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Holderman et al v. Walker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv06324
Plaintiff: Emily Vuckovitch-Leitschuh, Dr. Jason Kosek, Sarah Kosek and others
Defendant: Silver Cross Hospital and Medical Center, Advocate Christ Hospital and Medical Center, Dr. Jill Glick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Unique Casework Installations, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv08004
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Apprentice Training Fund, Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Supplemental Retirement Fund, Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund and others
Defendant: Patricia Davis and Unique Casework Installations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Travelers Indemnity Company et al v. Unique Casework Installations, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv06363
Plaintiff: Travelers Indemnity Company , Travelers Casualty and Surety Company and The Phoenix Insurance Company
Defendant: Unique Casework Installations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Unique Casework Installations, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv05917
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Supplemental Retirement Fund and others
Defendant: Unique Casework Installations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund, et al, v. Unique Casework Installations, Inc.
as 1:2017cv02735
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund, et al
Defendant: Unique Casework Installations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Unique Casework Installations, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv09173
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Supplemental Retirement Fund , Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund and others
Defendant: Unique Casework Installations, Inc. and Patricia Davis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds of Illinois et al v. Unique Casework Installations, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv07599
Plaintiff: Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds of Illinois and Angelica B. Ambrose
Defendant: Unique Casework Installations, Inc. and Patricia Davis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Unique Casework Installations, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01416
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Supplemental Retirement Fund , Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund and others
Defendant: Unique Casework Installations, Inc. and Patricia Davis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Unique Casework Installations, Inc.
as 1:2014cv10267
Plaintiff: Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Supplemental Retirement Fund and others
Defendant: Unique Casework Installations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds of Illinois et al v. Unique Casework Installations, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv10157
Plaintiff: Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds of Illinois and Angelica B. Ambrose
Defendant: Unique Casework Installations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?