Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Franklin et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01286
Plaintiff:
Casey Franklin and Peggy Franklin
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Lee et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02672
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee, Jeremiah Lord, Jeremiah Baker and others
Defendant:
3M Company, 3M Occupational Safety, LLC, Aearo Holding, LLC and others
Weigel v. Renewal by Andersen LLC
as 0:2023cv01878
Plaintiff:
Casey Weigel
Defendant:
Renewal by Andersen LLC and Renewal by Andersen LLC doing business as Renewal by Andersen of the Greater Twin Cities doing business as Renewal by Andersen of the Twin Cities
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kono et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Casey Kono, David Velasquez, Jonathan Griffith and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Casey v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv00762
Defendant:
3M Occupational Safety LLC, Aearo Intermediate LLC, Aearo Technologies LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Casey
Baker et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv00100
Plaintiff:
Casey Baker, Rowdy Huff, Shawn Kiser and others
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Copeland et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv01490
Plaintiff:
Darnell Robinson, Michael Fansler, Rich Jaterka and others
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Ketchum v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv00148
Defendant:
3M Occupational Safety LLC, Aearo Intermediate LLC, Aearo Technologies LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Casey Ketchum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Hunt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02150
Plaintiff:
Ryan Cooper, Eric Vihinen, Joseph Topping and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Rojas et al v. Saulsberry et al
as 0:2019cv02208
Plaintiff:
Jose Filiberto Rojas, Dustin Jay Sanderlin, Ryan Schuck and others
Defendant:
Aearo, LLC, Aearo Holdings, LLC, 3M Company and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
