Cases 1 - 10 of 164
CASEY v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
BRIAN M CASEY
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASEY v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
BRIAN M CASEY
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASEY v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CASEY
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Gibson
as 6:2023cv02476
Plaintiff:
Tarick Donta Harris
Defendant:
Casey R. Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patel v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
as 8:2023cv02924
Petitioner:
Sean Casey Patel
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCKENZIE v. PATTERSON et al
as 4:2023cv00470
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER PATTERSON, CASEY T BARREN, BRITTNEY BAXTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Senecharles v. State of Florida et al
as 1:2023cv23173
Plaintiff:
Leslye Senecharles
Defendant:
State of Florida, Governor Ron DeSantis, Jill Casey DeSantis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcello III v. Desantis et al
as 2:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
Anthony Francis Marcello III
Defendant:
Casey Desantis, Gov Ron Desantis and Sarasota County Sherriff's Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Riley et al
as 3:2023cv00825
Plaintiff:
Gregory Donte Willis
Defendant:
Darren Riley, Judson Crawford, Mave Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKENZIE v. LOVE et al
as 4:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MEGAN MCKENZIE and CASEY TIDWELL BARREN
Defendant:
ERIC LOVE, RON DESANTIS, NEAL DUNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
